Nuclear is Our Future is fundamentally an activist organization. We’re here to take action: here’s the action we want to take.
Ongoing Actions:
- Support New Nuclear Power Plants
30-odd nuclear power plants have been proposed in the last four years. We ask you to support their construction.- Proposed New Nuclear Power Plants
- Design Licensing Project
- Support Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR) Licensing
- Support Pebble-Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) Licensing
Support the design certification of the first pebble-bed reactor.
Read our list of current new nuclear power plant projects.
Support the certification of new nuclear power plant designs.
Support the design certification of this Canadian waste-eating reactor.
- Oppose Reactor Bans
Their rationales are no longer valid–and really never were. Their effect has been the exact opposite of what was intended. Reactor bans must go.
Use the internet as a component of real-world activism.
- Work With Us
- Weekly Nuclear Poll
- Nuclear Advocacy Webring
- Tools
- Nuclear Mailing Lists
- Books
- Subscriptions
We’d love your help in getting the word out!
Take an opinion - Give an opinion.
Join our network of pro-nuclear websites.
Links to online services that we’ve found useful, or that we ourselves provide.
Sign up for updates from Nuclear is Our Future and others.
How to turn your knowledge into advocacy.
via RSS to content published by Nuclear is Our Future
The current regulatory structure is the product of industry self-interest and anti-nuclear activism, and badly needs reform along policy objectives.
Make the polluters pay.
The Department of Energy is supporting a disorganized, fragmented, and unfocused development program. It’s time to stop the 60-year vicious cycle of government waste.
Why do reactor bans cite nuclear waste when there are waste-eating reactors?
They haven’t broken any rules and want access to American-style reactor technology that would neutralize any proliferation risk from their existing enrichment facility.
Allow utilities to apply a per-kilowatt-hour surcharge for Construction Work In Progress (CWIP).
There is absolutely no evidence for the 1950s assumption that all radiation causes cancer–and a lot of evidence against it.
We haven’t scratched the surface of what can be done with nuclear energy. Sadly, nuclear technologies don’t get research and development attention, largely because they’re usually planned well enough that they don’t cause urgent problems that need to be solved.
Past Actions:
- Chernobyl+20
- Support the Development of the Integral Fast Reactor
- Support PRISM Licensing
Setting the record straight about Chernobyl on the accident’s 20th anniversary.
The IFR was canceled and has been decommissioned. Restarting the program is no longer possible in the US, and most of the program’s remaining objectives are being achieved in a similar development project in Japan.
GE’s and Argonne’s attempt to apply the IFR design to a power plant was withdrawn from the NRC licensing process soon after it was submitted.
This page was written by Stewart Peterson on May 28, 2009




