Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“First and perhaps foremost, although nuclear plants are cheap to operate once they are up and running, they are by far the most expensive to build.”

-Resources for the Future

Because of anti-nuclear lawsuits and delay tactics combined with high interest rates in the early 1980s and bad regulation. There’s nothing inherently expensive about nuclear reactors per se. In fact, the actual material initial investment (as opposed to NRC fees) for an Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) may turn out to be lower than a coal plant that meets emissions standards.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Economics, Politics and Regulation, Their Actions

Posted on November 30, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“The death toll from a Cassini accident was put by Dr. Ernest Sternglass, professor emeritus of radiological physics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, at 20 million to 40 million.

And this is not a sky-is-falling story. Of 28 U.S. space missions using plutonium, there have been three accidents, the worst in 1964 in which a plutonium-powered satellite fell back to Earth, breaking up and spreading the toxic radioactive substance widely.”

-Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space

Then why haven’t there been 60 million to 120 million deaths? And what about the other two “accidents”–which involved accidents in the spacecraft, not the RTG (nuclear battery)?

This reminds me of another conspiracy crowd.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Conspiracy, Environment, Fun With Statistics, Health, Safety

Posted on November 29, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“One other key element of the new Bush space policy is the expanded use of nuclear power systems to “enable or significantly enhance space exploration or operational capabilities.” What this means is that the aerospace industry wants to establish mining colonies on the Moon, Mars and other planetary bodies and they want to power these bases with nuclear reactors. The military has also long been saying they need nuclear reactors in space to provide power for space weapons systems. So the nuclear industry also plans to utilize space as a new market for increasing corporate profits.”

-Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space

Look, somebody’s going to make money off of providing energy. That could be the nuclear industry (uranium), or it could be the oil industry (kerosene or LH2), or it could be their buddies in the solar panel industry. If you look at a spacecraft design, and see how much is fuel, and how much more could be done with more energy available, it’s silly to not include a nuclear reactor.
In short, they’re worried that with nuclear reactors, people might actually do something to explore space. And engineers everywhere–especially aerospace and nuclear engineers–should be worried about their jobs. If these people win, your extra education will go toward designing can openers. It’s time for engineers–or even engineering students–to wake up, get out from behind their desks and start talking to people!

Filed under Alternatives, Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Conspiracy, Economics, Energy, Physics

Posted on November 28, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“We know for a fact that large amounts of radioactivity escaped from the Three Mile Island accident. But, the nuclear industry and the government did not collect release estimates for specific isotopes, and to this day, there is no available information about which isotopes escaped nor the actual quantity of radiation that was released.”

-Helen Caldicott, Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer, p.66

For the umpteenth time, I fail to see how radioactivity can escape–radioactivity is a characteristic of radioactive materials; wherever the material is, the radioactivity is. Or, for that matter, how you can collect (measure) an estimate. But anyway:
How would they have measured it, unless they had a mass spectrometer on the site from the start of the accident? And how could materials other than iodine and noble gases have gotten into the off-gas system to begin with?

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Environment, Physics, Safety, Three Mile Island

Posted on November 27, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 1 Comment »

Bookmark and Share

Gofman Award Nominations Request

Three nominations (for Jim Phelps, Helen Caldicott, and Jan Peczkis) were received in the first few days after the nomination period opened. None have been received since.

Please?

Filed under Crackpots, Humor, Site

Posted on November 26, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 1 Comment »

Bookmark and Share

Conspiracy Flowchart Update

Apparently the Conspiracy Flowchart has been updated and a second version produced (previous post on this issue).

I hadn’t heard about the Three-Mile-Island-KFC connection before; the only one I’d heard of was Helen Caldicott’s conspiracy theory about Hershey’s.

Filed under Conspiracy, Humor, Site, Three Mile Island

Posted on November 26, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“Depleted uranium is a highly toxic and radioactive byproduct of the uranium enrichment process needed in nuclear reactors and the manufacture of nuclear weapons.

And, according to independent scientists, “a DU antitank round outside its metal casing can emit as much radiation in one hour as 50 chest X-rays.” (5) A tank driver receives a radiation dose of 0.13 rem/hr to his or her head from overhead DU armor (6) which may seem like a very low dose. However, after 32 continuous days, or 64 12-hour days, the amount of radiation a tank driver receives to his head will exceed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual standard for public whole-body exposure to man-made sources of radiation.”

-Green Parties World Wide

The first sentence is (intentionally?) ambiguous about DU’s toxicity. They never say that DU is highly radioactive (it isn’t), but it is clearly implied. Plus, enrichment is needed neither for nuclear weapons nor nuclear reactors. A bomb can be made from plutonium, which would be produced from natural uranium in a specialized weapons-production reactor. A civilian reactor may or may not need enriched uranium, depending on the type of reactor. Reactors used in the US and most of the rest of the world do; reactors in Canada (and a few in other places) do not. A connection between uranium bombs (nuclear weapons based on weapons-grade highly-enriched uranium) and American-style reactors (which use low-enriched uranium) is also implied; the only connection is that an enrichment facility that is in use for American-style-reactor fuel production cannot be used for weapons production (i.e., the nuclear power plant poses a negative proliferation risk by requiring that a dual-use facility be used for civilian purposes).

The second statement has a couple of major practical problems. First, DU doesn’t emit x-rays, so a comparison between a piece of DU and an x-ray machine is pointless. X-rays penetrate objects; alpha particles from DU do not–they would be blocked by any one of the following: anything covering the DU plating, four inches of air, the tank driver’s helmet, or the skin on the tank driver’s head. And the allowed whole-body dose to the public is not the occupational allowed dose to part of the body–they’re factoring in children and pregnant women, and the calculation is based on weight of the entire body, not the weight of the head (a given intensity of radiation over the whole body involves much more radiation than that same intensity to only the head). The only way to be harmed by DU is to eat it, and even then, the chemical toxicity is much worse than the insignificant radiation produced.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Conspiracy, Fuel Cycle, Health, Physics, Radiation

Posted on November 26, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 3 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“The Pentagon says DU is relatively harmless, emitting “only” 60% the radiation of nondepleted uranium.”

-Green Parties World Wide

Which itself is barely radioactive.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Fuel Cycle, Fun With Statistics, Physics

Posted on November 25, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Friends of the Earth: Rooftop Windmills Don’t Work

What a shocker. Yet they will continue to not listen to us…

Link.

Filed under Alternatives, Economics, Energy, Industry Performance, Their Actions

Posted on November 24, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“Background radiation was one of the main instigators of evolution, as it induced mutations in the reproductive DNA molecules or genes of plants and animals.”

-Helen Caldicott, Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer, p.40

Not transcription errors?

It’s also sort of interesting how the effect of radiation at those levels is statistically undetectable. Most people agree on this; that was the conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences last year. I would argue that if it is not statistically detectable among transcription errors, it’s not very significant if it is there at all. It is doubly interesting that the most statistically powerful studies (i.e., ones with few extraneous variables) consistently find either no harm or a small benefit, especially the shipyard study. I would not suggest that background radiation exposure directly produces a health benefit, only that there is quite a lot of statistical noise on both sides of zero.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day, Fun With Statistics, Health, Radiation

Posted on November 23, 2006 by Stewart Peterson | 1 Comment »

Bookmark and Share
Nuclear Advocacy Webring
Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future
Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet
Get Your Free Web Ring
by Bravenet.com
taking viagra woman; Order Viagra Cheap gerneric viagra cheap herbal herbal viagra viagra viagra 576.