Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“Help us track the effects of radiation in your community by simply donating one of your child’s baby teeth.”

-Radiation and Public Health Project (aka Tooth Fairy Study)

1. This is not scientific. There is no set sample, no control group or control data, not even a certainty that the teeth in question came from the community from which they were sent. There is no assurance that the teeth (and materials therein) came from people who had lived in the community their entire lives; for example, they might drink milk from cows hundreds of miles away.
2. The radiation levels are not necessarily due to fallout from weapons testing or (even more unlikely) from nuclear power plants. Any radioactive materials in the teeth, depending on where the teeth came from, would probably have come from radioactive mineral deposits (even granite) or coal plants.
3. Who is going to respond to this? Anti-nuclear activists reading that page. We all know that anti-nuclear activists are unbiased and wouldn’t send in 28 teeth from people who grew up next to whichever coal plant feeds nuclear weapons test blockhouses in Nevada and silently throw away ones from Vermont.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 29, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 4 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

NIOF.org Update #18

Nuclear Safety will be down for some editing for a few days.

Filed under Site

Posted on September 29, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“LCNP provides legal arguments opposing the claim in the Non Proliferation Treaty to an “inalienable right” to nuclear energy.”

-Lawyers’ Committee on Nuclear Policy

Ugh.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 29, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“The decision today by the NRC commissioners to approve a private nuclear waste site on the Goshute Indian reservation in Utah is the latest example of environmental racism on the part of the federal government. The commissioners, who voted 3-1, have now condemned a tiny impoverished tribe in Skull Valley to generations of environmental and health risks by approving a plan to ship 44,000 tons of high-level radioactive waste and park it in plain site on Indian land.”

-Michael Mariotte

The racism is not in using land suitable only for things like nuclear waste storage for nuclear waste storage but in forcing Native Americans onto land suitable only for nuclear waste storage. What is difficult about this? Why do you think they’re poor?

I bet NIRS wouldn’t be complaining if a coal mine was opened there instead.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 28, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“But even the smallest amounts of man-made radioactivity can cause genetic damage leading to cancer, leukaemia, still birth, birth defects and other health problems which may only become apparent in future generations.”

-Low-Level Radiation Campaign

Then why doesn’t natural radiation cause cancer? Humans don’t have any magic powers to make new kinds of radiation; animals (and more recently humans) have been exposed to much higher radiation levels since the beginning of life on Earth. All of a sudden, it causes cancer? The industrial revolution comes along, people start smoking, life expectancy increases dramatically, and cancer rates concurrently skyrocket with no changes in radiation levels (if anything, a decrease)–and radiation is at fault?

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 27, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

NIOF.org Update #17

New Uploads:
Contact Us
History
Legal
Policies
Updates
Admins
401 Authorization Failed (not very interesting)

Filed under Site

Posted on September 26, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

GN Global Protest Week

Remember, October 1-8 is the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space’s global protest week. If you are aware of anything in your area, please try to get something together or tell someone else who can.

I suggest the discussion board as a good medium in this instance.

Filed under Uncategorized

Posted on September 26, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“Inherently safe should mean inherently insurable; therefore, nuclear operators should be able to privately insure them.”

-CMEP

No. If there are thousands of lawyers lining up to sue anyone who does anything with nuclear energy in any form, a private insurance company will not insure a nuclear power plant. Safety has nothing to do with it. The number and quantity of claims is what an insurance company pays attention to.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 26, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

NIOF.org Update #16

New uploads:
NIOF in the Press
Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day Archives
Press Release: NIOF Online

Updates:
Press Release Archives
About NIOF.org
New Press Release Directory

Filed under Site

Posted on September 25, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share

Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

“June 29 - A NAS report concludes that there is no such thing as safe levels of radiation; NEIS believes that this could spell the end of the Nuclear Industry.”

-NEIS

Three things:
1. Too late. Nuclear energy is dead.
2. The NAS report, if you actually read it, basically says that there isn’t a whole lot of evidence either way (something I disagree with) but that a conservative policy would be to keep assuming no threshold.
3. Replacing a coal-fired power plant with a nuclear reactor reduces radiation exposure by over a factor of 100. Replacing a nuclear power plant with hundreds of acres of solar panels and/or wind turbines solves the radiation problem but then we have dead birds and fish and expensive, intermittent electricity that requires backup diesel generators. Where do you get the diesel? Radioactive coal or unstable dictatorships? Running the generators on ethanol would mean conversion of arable land to fuel production, causing rising food prices, meaning some people can’t afford it and starve. Natural gas can come from radioactive coal, unstable dictatorships, or fabulous-for-the-environment offshore drilling. Natural gas, diesel, and coal all contribute to global warming. Diesel exhaust is one of the worst industrial carcinogens. Getting rid of nuclear energy as an attempt to stop cancer obviously could work–but we’d have to take a pre-industrial standard of living, which is not worth it. Cancer rates will plummet, though, if people don’t live long enough to get it. I hope this isn’t most people’s idea of a public health strategy.

Filed under Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day

Posted on September 25, 2005 by Stewart Peterson | 0 Comments »

Bookmark and Share
Nuclear Advocacy Webring
Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future
Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet
Get Your Free Web Ring
by Bravenet.com
taking viagra woman; Order Viagra Cheap gerneric viagra cheap herbal herbal viagra viagra viagra 576.